Michael S. Schmidt of the NYT buries the lede as deeply as possible, all the way at the bottom of his story:
LOS ANGELES — Gwyneth Paltrow struggled to hold herself back as she stood next to President Obama on Thursday evening in her own Brentwood backyard. Mr. Obama, she told dozens of Democratic donors, has brought a “passion” to the presidency that would “be one of the most important and scrutinized and looked at…”
Then came what was apparently on her mind all along. “You’re so handsome that I can’t speak properly,” she said before handing the microphone over to Mr. Obama…
Other than her remarks about the president’s looks, Ms. Paltrow stayed on message. She said that the president needed a Congress controlled by Democrats to move the nation in the right direction.
“It would be wonderful if we are able to give this man all the power he needs to accomplish the things he needs to,” Ms. Paltrow said.
Throwing away the United States Constitution is staying “on message”? I guess that’s true, as far as the White House is concerned.
Back in the ’30s, American “progressives” fell in love with Mussolini. “If only we had a man like that in America,” they sighed. Congratulations, lefties. You finally got your wish.
All the Democrats who are actually accountable to voters are renouncing Obama’s name, because their constituents are no longer able to ignore reality. For the sake of poor Barry’s ego, it’s good to know he still has a source of narcissistic supply in Hollywood.
